Renderings: Public Park Proposed On Watson Island In Exchange For Condos

A new website has been created showing conceptual images of a park on Watson Island (to see all 16 images, click here).

Developers Terra and ESJ Capital, the owner of Jungle Island want to develop hundreds of condos on the north side of the island.

In exchange, they would buy or lease the Jungle Island property, cancel the theme park and hotel lease, build a 13-acre park, and contribute $15m towards affordable housing, infrastructure, and public benefits.

A Biscayne Bay boardwalk is shown as part of plans for the park. An under-bridge activator is also shown, to connect to another planned development at Island Gardens, on the island’s south side.

A City of Miami referendum is scheduled for November 5, with the following question:

Shall Miami’s Charter be amended authorizing sale and/or lease of 5.4 acres on Watson Island based upon fair market value of $135,000,000 to Ecoresiliency Miami LLC for residential and commercial uses pursuant to applicable zoning, waiving bidding, and requiring:

  • Returning 13 acres to City to construct new public waterfront park at no cost to City;
  • Cancelling existing theme park and hotel lease; and
  • Contributing $15,000,000 for affordable housing, infrastructure, and other public benefits?

 


137 Comments
most voted
newest oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Annonymous
1 month ago

Love It!

Jessy
1 month ago

I hate it

NOPE
1 month ago

Absolutely no!!!

Anonymous
1 month ago

Don’t worry! They been proposing stuff for Watson Island for decades and nothing ever gets done.

Elementary Dear Watson
1 month ago

Because of the dopes that think eliminating revenue generating real estate and replacing it with resource sucking ideas.
They are getting their T-shirts printed already.

Anonymous
1 month ago

Public space is essentially to a functioning, dense city. Imagine thinking Central Park is a “resource sucking idea”

Consuelo
1 month ago

Public space is a very nice addition to a dense city and it should be obvious that there is a law of diminishing returns.

Comparing Watson Island to Central Park is asinine.

What exists on the 18.4 Acres piece of land today is a Theme Park and the commensurate two story parking structure.

What exists today is land that is tied up in a lease valued at $60m. For all the geniuses who voted against $150m, you have just voted for $60m and a silly Parrot Jungle until it withers away like the Seaquarium.

[Nevermind that Central Park is 843 acres of park surrounded by residential dwellings with density of about 73,000 people per sq mile, while this Theme Park is only 18.4 acres surrounded by precisely ZERO residential units on the island.]

Jason
27 days ago

Well….
Reading and thinking about your post, and “imagining” as you write.

There is really no comparison at all. Any thinking adult would never conflate Central Park with the small swatch of land on Watson Island.

Most thinking adults would be ashamed to even type that idea in the public view.
Perhaps that explains why your name is Anonymous.

Miami Mike
1 month ago

NO! That island was fine before the Parrot Jungle catastrophe (Bankrupt) and the Miami Childrens Museum (busy but stupid waste of prime space indoors only)
which makes no liquor sale due to kids ….
alot happened with voters approvals and Lobbyists Shameful. Most ideal space dead.

Confused
1 month ago

Can someone explain the opposition? Right now this island is mostly parking lots / barren land. This looks like a beautiful proposal with a really nice public park – why are people opposed…?

Dan
1 month ago

Because that land should become a park and serve the entire city, It shouldn’t be sold to a private developer for the building of highrises.

Elementary Dear Watson
1 month ago

Let me entertain this idea….

So, instead of:
a 13 acre park AND
$135,000,000 payment to to the City to use it as they please, AND
$15,000,000 toward Affordable Housing , AND
1,000’s of direct and indirect jobs in construction, architecture, engineering, design, sales, legal, etc etc, AND
ANNUAL Property Tax Revenue (40% of which goes to MiamiDade Public Schools), AND
at ZERO cost to the taxpayer.

OR
A very large park.

No $135M. No $15M housing. No Annual Revenue. No jobs. No competent landscape architects. No bay walk.

Who is going to PAY to make that dirt look nice?
Who is going to operate the park each year?
Who is going to PAY to operate the park each year?
Who is going to keep all those acres safe?
Who is going to PAY to keep all those acres safe?

Anonymous
1 month ago

The last proposal with Jungle and Childrens Museum FAILED
that is why

Anon
1 month ago

The only land being developed in this proposal is currently a parking garage. The rest of it remains public park – along with a $15 million donation to housing and infrastructure.

So I’m really not understanding the opposition still…

Elementary Dear Watson
1 month ago

I just noticed that too…
The current plan of Theme Park, Hotel, Parking Garage is not great for the public.

Check out that website. The way the towers are placed and the waterfront park is featured is terrific.

The City of Miami can put that $135m in some bonds paying 5% per year, and there will be $6.75M per year, every year, to sweep the sidewalks and water the plants!!

Anon
1 month ago

That existing mess is what we never wanted. HUGE MISTAKE when parrot jungle was granted this mess.

Elementary Dear Watson
1 month ago

Nope. They can’t.
Not intelligently.

Anonymous
1 month ago

What?! did you just arrive to Miami?!

Anonymous
30 days ago

Renderings = “CONCEPTUAL ONLY”.

Elementary Dear Watson
1 month ago

You like it just the way that is has been for the last 35 years……
Of course.

Anon
1 month ago

It has only ONLY been like this for the last 15 years……. so get with it.

Anonymous
1 month ago

35 years? nope that island was destroyed 20 years ago only…. it was beautiful before Jungle and horrible Childrens Museum

aon
1 month ago

It’ll never look like this!

Taxed Out
1 month ago

I don’t hate it. But I usually hate the idea of using prime public real estate for private uses (see Melreese)

Elementary Dear Watson
1 month ago

Or Soundscape. The state of the art New World Symphony public park where all generations go to enjoy concerts broadcast on the wall what used to be a surface parking lot.

Or Smith & Wollensky’s in South Point Park.

I usually hate when Government does something that they have never succeeded in doing.

Anon
19 days ago

It’s going to be a public park. The towers are replacing a parking garage.

Anonymous
1 month ago

everyone happy….

let'sgetreal
1 month ago

Just the developer will be happy…

Shawn Kouri
1 month ago

So originally back in 2018, voters approved plan for a 300 room hotel with adventure Park and a waterpark. Now they want to change the plans and convert most parts of jungle Island into a public park complete with a condo tower or two? Does this mean the hotel is no longer happening?

Anon
1 month ago

Voters were led by developers (like now with Casinos) to rape the landscape. This is a perfect example of how a perfect virgin land was destroyed by developers- who failed and now are leaving!.

Anonymous
1 month ago

TOTALLY AGREE

Anonymous
1 month ago

😂 adventure park? What is that

Kakatoo
1 month ago

Watching parrots talk and sing …

Anonymous
1 month ago

LOL jaja jaja exactly !!!

Anonymous
1 month ago

Go back when voters approved Jungle Island (!!@><!!!??) Destroyed island

VOTE NO
1 month ago

Complete BS, they will never delivery appropriately. We need to stop selling public land, lease at MOST. Every time we enter one of these deals the developer always under delivers. Still waiting for that park next to Kaseya center.

Elementary Dear Watson
1 month ago

Terra did exceptional work with 87 Park condo tower where they invested about $11m into that North Beach park.

Terra also did exceptional work with Canopy Park was designed by ArqGeo & West 8. It is a 3 Acre public park that also collects and filters an extrodinary about of rainwater. People who know South Beach know that West Avenue at 7th Street WAS one of the most photographed parts of South Beach whenever their was a heavy downpour.

I’d put my money on Terra and David Martin to do something special AND especially considerate to the community.

Anonymous
1 month ago

Are you referencing the same 87 Park condo that they “bought” the street from the city, gave the city that $11m for the park, but the park never improved like the visuals that they showed all of us?

The same 87 Park where they built on the street that they “bought”, which was right next to the Champlain Tower that collapsed?

That 87 Park?

Consuelo
1 month ago

No.
The park is on south, and Champlain Tower was to the north, so I don’t think that is what is being referred to.

The crosswalk and safety improvements leading the public park and beach on the southside is exceptional. I don’t know anyone that uses it who complains about it.

Truth Matters
1 month ago

Another generation goes by with nothing but plans and fruitless drawings.

Cover the Podiums
1 month ago

Tall towers don’t belong in the bay. They look so out of place. Just another piggy bank in the sky for some foreign investors

Confused
1 month ago

Have you seen the city of Miami? It is literally all towers on Biscayne Bay…

Anonymous
1 month ago

Not all of it, it’s staggered , lots of room to stagger up there without blocking

anonymous
1 month ago

Another poor deal by city of Miami. At minimum they should require the developer to pay the cost to build a metromover station at the park.

Also, parking has to be free at least if you are a City of Miami resident because saying its free isnt true if i gotta pay to park there.

bruhlol
1 month ago

why tf do they have to shut down Joia Beach???

Anonymous
1 month ago

The food is mediocre at best. Location is spot on, but that’s all it has going for itself.

.305
1 month ago

It would be sad if they would close Joia, its a very unique setting for a restaurant in Miami

Anon
1 month ago

WTF does JOIA have to do with this thread?

Anon
1 month ago

Because the bathroom is 1/2 mile away from the seating

Anonymous
1 month ago

what in the heck is Joia Beach? a club that has existed for last 5 years only? that no one goes to?

?man
1 month ago

Return the part to the city, or other public benefits?

The question mark already implying that they won’t do the benefits part and hope to let it slide.

Pete
1 month ago

I voted NO! This is a terrible idea.

Marianne
1 month ago

This island should be a public park, all of it!

Miapolis
1 month ago

It could almost be the Miami Central Park equivalent people talk about. Southside Park is not even close to covering it.

Anonymous
1 month ago

Um, and what about Bayfront and Museum Parks?

Kakatoo
1 month ago

As if it didn’t exist…lol

Anonymous
1 month ago

Bayfront is a tiny park aside a major highway and is not pedestrian friendly —- well nor is Watson Island really

Anonymous
1 month ago

Watson is less pedestrian friendly at least you can walk to bay front on a nice day from Brickell or take metro mover on a bad day

Build it
1 month ago

How would this be Central Park? The bulk of Dade’s population lives nowhere near this *island*. Emphasis on island. This is not an easy site to reach on foot. This is Randals Island at best. Might as well get a park and some much needed housing.

Anonymous
1 month ago

They should have a pulley air tram on a wire with gondolas that steps here and then to Miami Beach. The city would make bank on tourists and probably would be top driver of revenue on our transit system

Anonymous
1 month ago

Southside is about an acre of land

Anonymous
1 month ago

Except hundreds of thousands of people live around Southside Park, many without cars who want a Central Park and will actually use it. What is this island that is basically an highway overpass to Miami Beach? and this will all be vacationers who use cars, a park that nobody can reach for people who have parks in their buildings, silly

Anon
1 month ago

Theres such a housing shortage…this is an enormous amount of land….

Marianne
1 month ago

There is no housing shortage in Miami, plenty of housing all over the city and plenty of empty lots to be built on. This should be a park.

Anon
1 month ago

It is going to be a park….did you not look at the proposal? The park is HUGE

Dan
1 month ago

The park is a tiny token for building a huge high-rise. Read between the lines, don’t fall in developer’s trap.

Pricylla mi nilla
1 month ago

Don’t be emotional Dan.
Think.
What is it now. Today.
It is land controlled by a developer with every right to open a Theme Park and a Hotel.
NOW, there is no obligation to build a park, except for the FOR PAY theme park that you might get a local discount off the $64 admission price.

Think Dan.

The issue to be voted on is…..
Do you love that Theme Park, or would you rather have a waterfront park, $135m and more.

Dan either loves theme parks, doesn’t love public parks, or really has no clue about anything.

Anonymous
1 month ago

Rather have the theme park honestly, condos here would be a joke and just contest the city with more traffic on a main connection point and upend taxes to keep building sea walls for the condo owners who benefit, not with our tax money

Anonymous
1 month ago

The entire island should be a natural preserve and be purely used as a gondola stop over for connections, and information center that educates people on Miami and Miami Beach and how they are similar different and connected.

Elementary Dear Watson
1 month ago

15 acres is about the right size for a park here. Especially with the water access and incredible views to the Downtown Miami Skyline.

Due west, is a massive park, Mo Frere Park, Bayfront Park, etc. LOTS OF PARKS, and unless properly activated and near housing, they go largely empty.

Anonymous
1 month ago

That’s why we should build condos where we already have park land and waterfront spaces in downtown where people actually want to live and see used

Build it
1 month ago

Take a look at housing prices. Delusional.

Anonymous
1 month ago

Housing prices are part of our nationwide Inflation issue / problem.

J.M.
1 month ago

True, I don’t think housing on Watson Island would be ideal tho.

Consuelo
1 month ago

For sure, a Theme Park wouldn’t be better.
I like how the park goes under the McArthur Causeway along the bayfront to connect with the marina the new projects over there on the West side. this will be a great vantage point for Independence Day Fireworks!

The original Flagstone idea was fantastic, and they did a lot of heavy lifting to clean up and dredge that mega yacht marina site, it is refreshing to see a large public park and enough programing to go with it.

Anon
1 month ago

there is no shortage of poor housing demand

Anonymous
1 month ago

…and you expect this to be affordable housing with 360-degree bay views?

Pricylla mi nilla
1 month ago

No.
The plan calls for $15m to be allocated for affordable housing somewhere else.
Why not?

Anonymous
1 month ago

there is no housing shortage Cash shortage maybe

Elementary Dear Watson
1 month ago

Of course it should not.

Parks COST money.

Homes MAKE money, and pay millions for schools, and provide housing for people to raise families, or live, or, etc. etc.

DJN
22 days ago

The City of Miami cannot afford a new park? With so many condominiums built in Downtown Miami/ Brickell recently (and continuing), the City has generated enormous amounts of additional property tax revenue. With the property values of all the other existing condominiums rising significantly over the past few years (50% plus), the City has also generated enormous amounts of additional property tax revenue. It should be able to afford the cost of a park and maintaining it without having to sell a small bit of land to build yet more condominium units. Too much of a good thing is a bad thing (over-development, overcrowded city, traffic congestion, etc.)

Witnessing another scam
1 month ago

Give developer land zoned park, and in return the developer will give it back to the city as park. What am I missing?

Elementary Dear Watson
1 month ago

The proposal eliminates a Hotel/Theme park in favor of a park for citizens, and maybe 3 or 4 acres will be for homes.

This is such a no brainer.

Anon
1 month ago

Tear down the existing mistake that MiamiDade made 15 years ago.
Turn it into a perfect park. I am sure that those owners of Parrot Jungle et al did not make a profit as this was a mess of an idea. Voters ( YOU AND ME ) made a HUGE mistake to give this land to silly ass private people behind Jungle Island.

Anonymous
1 month ago

You’re missing that they’re building condos IN THE PARK and getting the land for pennies on the dollar.

It’s unbelievably cheeky.

I’ll definitely be voting No on this, hopefully everyone will see through what this really is.

Pricylla mi nilla
1 month ago

One hundred and fifty million is “pennies on the dollar”??

Caucasian, puhleeeeease…..

Anonymous
1 month ago

Yaaaaaasssss

Miapolis
1 month ago

With a Metromover stop between downtown and south beach, this island could be a large Park like Miami’s Central Park equivalent.

Dan
1 month ago

BEST COMMENT!

Anonymous
1 month ago

Yes… a tranquil park dwarf by a giant flyover for a tin can shorbus/unsheltered individual moving Porta Potty.

Anon
1 month ago

Bro has never been to a city.

Anon
27 days ago

Anyone who starts off a sentence with Bro has never been past 11th grade.

Kakatoo
1 month ago

Another large park facing the largest public park in downtown Miami. …

YES
1 month ago

YES!!!!

Anonymous
1 month ago

what park? the park on the highway of US1 called the mess of Perez Museum et al?

peej
1 month ago

do Highways have crosswalks & stoplights? c’mon now…

?man
1 month ago

Riddle me this, riddle me that
Why are the public benefits always done last?

anonymous
1 month ago

Most of the proposed ‘park’ resembles a giant weed patch.

Manhattan2Mia
1 month ago

Whatever makes the most profit will happen, always follow the money.

Elementary Dear Watson
1 month ago

Over time, the Theme Park and the Hotel would make more money if the project is left as it is today.

Building condominiums will yield the developer profit (not the most) in the first 4 years (if they do it right), and then any land appreciation (profit) goes to the individual people who buy the condominiums.

If the homes proposal is passed (eliminating the Theme Park/Hotel), it won’t be the most profit, but it will be the best use.

Anonymous
1 month ago

The winner here would be the developer as jungle island is not making the profit, so try to reinvent themselves.

Pricylla mi nilla
1 month ago

The developer has the know how to make something great out of a neglected site.
The developer is going to pay the City $150m.
The developer is going to build waterfront walks and parks.

Think this through.
The City has owned this land for a very very very long time. They have done nothing but sign stupid leases.

Yet, the chorus is “Make it a City Park”.

Vote “Do not let people who know what they are doing do things”. Have the City of Miami design and build real estate and parks!

That will work out the same way as it has for 35 years on that site.

Anonymous
1 month ago

if the money was triple this amount and used to improve downtown and Brickell non-DDA zones, and came with perpetual height restrictions at 4 floors, maybe.

Dtwn
1 month ago

Stop selling our parks!! The referendum is giving away park space to developers. Only in Miami!!

Anon
1 month ago

It’s not…the park will remain 13 acres. The current parking garage will be redeveloped into two towers. The comments here are baffling….

Dtwn
1 month ago

It’s all park!! I agree it needs to be redesigned. Stop trying to monetize our green spaces.

Pricylla mi nilla
1 month ago

Wow.
Are you seriously unaware of the plan is currently in place?
If not, get educated.

The existing plan is a Theme Park, Hotel, and parking. There is not waterfront walk (Unless you pay), there is no public access.

The plan calls for a $135,000,000 payment to the city.

Perhaps that should be invested into the Derek Zoolander Center for Kids Who Can’t Read Good.

Jordan
1 month ago

It’s not a park. Probably never has been a park.

Since 2017, it is.land stuck in a long term lease valued at $60m with an approved Theme Park (paid tickets, no free access).

Elementary Dear Watson
1 month ago

The two residential towers seem to take up less than 40% of the Theme Parks footprint, and ZERO percent of the waterfront.

Terra is great….they seem to be aware of the opportunity to dedicate 100% of the waterfront to the public. Smart.

Jordan
1 month ago

Almost right.
It”s 29% for the residences. 71% Public Park.

5.4acres for the homes and their private gardens and landscaping.
13 acres of land for Park.

Anonymous
1 month ago

Remember how watered down Island Gardens became before it went to pasture? Pepperidge Farm remembers….

Anon
1 month ago

Different developer

david k
1 month ago

Say no to any project that allows affordable housing. We need to keep these people away from our cities.

Get real
1 month ago

You want affordable housing in an island in between Miami and Miami Beach with the best views and waterfront on every corner? What are you smoking!

Anonymous
1 month ago

It will not be like this. I say NO to it.
This is just another scheme to get their hands on prime land and we are left with half the promise, of that. Look at maurice ferré park, under deck park, worldcenter, etc

Anonymous
1 month ago

Hard No. The developers are trying to steal this property.

If Ken Griffin paid almost $400m for the land next to Jade on Brickell, this property is easily worth much, much more than $150m.

In exchange, they build a “public” park that really benefits who? The residents of the new condo towers?

Give me a break, I don’t see a huge parking lot where residents can park their cars to enjoy this “park”.

Maybe a handful of people will risk life and limb to walk from downtown over the MacArthur causeway to go on foot, but let’s be real…. This is park is to make the condo’s more attractive and benefit the developer.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m all for development, but this is borderline theft of public land.

Oh, and I’m sure the $15m for “affordable housing” will be just enough cash for the city to spend on renovating some 20 unit apartment building in Overtown.

Anyone who votes yes on this needs to have their head examined.

Pricylla mi nilla
1 month ago

No they are not getting a “steal”.
Ken Giffin paid $363 Millions for 2.5acres of WATERFRONT land entitled to go 1,049 ft tall.
This proposal is for $500m for 5.4 acres of NON-waterfront land which cannot be built to that density and is hemmed in by marine/industrial uses NOT international banks and law offices.

So, what is a real comparable? (if that is the nonsense you want to play)
As the crow flies 2,000 yards to the due west, the last Melo Group bought 1301 N. Miami Ave. for $21m per acre for a zoning height of 24 stories.

Perhaps this Anonymous has a perfectly good and brainy head, and David Martin needs to have his “head examined”.

At $21m per acre, maybe Terra should reduce their offer price to $113.4M

Being cynical is okay to a certain extent…but don’t overdo it.

This proposal is much better than the Theme Park/Hotel that is contractually obligated to be built their now.

Anonymous
1 month ago

You’re missing the main point. The land is not zoned for condos. Period.

The price per acre is not relevant. I know that I made the comparison with the property next to Jade, but that’s was just for reference.

This is a money grab, and they aren’t doing this out of the kindness of their hearts.

It’s all to sell expensive condos, to spin it as “Hey, look at us, we are building you a beautiful new park”, is disingenuous and is preying on the less informed.

I’d personally rather see it sit vacant for years than have it be a “public park” that only the elite residents of the island will have access to.

The city could just as easily have put a bond to build a park onto the ballot, and supplement it with state grants. I believe Doral did this with the big park they’ve been building.

Someone else brought up a good point…. Who’s paying to maintain this park?

Consuelo
1 month ago

It is possible that people understand how the world works as well, if not better, than you do.

It is foolish to think that the ONLY reason to build a legacy is out of the kindness of your heart. Equally foolish that all men develop ONLY for money.

“Nobody but a beggar chuses to depend chiefly upon the benevolence of his fellow-citizens. Even a beggar does not depend upon it entirely. The charity of well-disposed people, indeed, supplies him with the whole fund of his subsistence. ” – Smith

So, your accusation that someone is stealing land, was not correct.
Now you are accusing them of a Money Grab.

So, you are the expert in doing nothing.
Why are you so angry at the men of action?

You would rather sabotage a park because…..because….because…why?

Because someone who builds a park for you may also make housing for others, for the architects, and builders, and appliance manufactures, and landscapers, and engineers, and valet parkers, and concierges, and window washers, and….might make money for his investors and himself.

Anonymous
1 month ago

Securing a deal from the City is priceless, worth more than the entire Miami Riverwalk and bayfront. It reshapes the entire city, creating a new condo market and overriding existing rights, with a far-reaching impact that surpasses the value of the land itself and all those affected. Given its immense value, it’s negligently being undervalued in the proposal, since it is truly priceless to the City and all whom inhabit it.

Anon
29 days ago

If you can’t post without using ChatGPT then don’t post.

Anonymous
1 month ago

The city commissioners should not sell this at under value, especially after they just voted a lifetime pension for themselves. Isn’t that illegal, if it’s worth 400k? The city should be making 800 million from it then because city land is more valuable because it impacts more people’s rights.

Look at the empty lot in North Beach
1 month ago

Let them do it and build something beautiful that we can all use. Otherwise, it just sits underutilized for years which turn into decades and nothing gets done. Give all this land to developers who can build world class venues that we can all enjoy. Look at marine stadium? what benefit have I gained from that derilict structure these past decades? I think I could have enjoyed visiting a renovated stadium with amenities if we had allowed developers to use their imagination and FUNDS to build something. Who gains from the empty lot on Collins in North beach? They didn’t allow the developer build what would be profitable to them but also bring in tax revenue, build a world class hotel, and spruce up the area. Instead we get to look at an empty lot with no economic engine to drive the neighborhood.

Jordan
1 month ago

Mostly agree. However, no one is “giving” David Martin the land, he’s paying $150 Million Dollars with lots of strings attached.

If he is willing to put his money where his mouth is, deal with the politicians, deal with the Not in My Backyard-ers, AND build something beautiful, than more power to him!

Anonymous
1 month ago

We already all use this land. How do we all use a private condo and their pocket park?

Bob Art Guy
1 month ago

Great. !!! Why can’t we get architecture this good on Brickell?

Bob brickell
1 month ago

Voted no. Plenty of other land that can be used for condos.

Chairman of everyone
1 month ago

I am delighted by the design. It would signal Miami’s “new era”